Evaluating historical sources for usefulness can often be difficult for students to grasp. This bonus episode looks at how to evaluate sources for usefulness.
When you are researching for history or even geography for that matter, you will come across a mountain of information on the Internet or in books or archives, wherever you are looking, and one of the most important skills you need to develop is to be a little judgemental about the sources you come across.
This episode is proudly sponsored by Amped Up Learning
Season One Cover Lesson Bundle
Contact: Twitter @HistoryDetect, Instagram @HistoryDetective9, email historydetective9@gmail.com
All original music written and performed by Kelly Chase.
Bonus: How to evaluate usefulness
Welcome
Hi, this is Kelly Chase and you are listening to History Detective, a podcast where I usually delve into the past to uncover the mysteries of history and then explore how that story might be reimagined through song. You can catch those episodes in your podcast feed, but this is special mid-season treat, so I am mixing it up a bit and I am hoping that today’s episode will be more useful than a chocolate teapot. (Rabbit Hole Music 1🎼)
The Skill
If you didn’t pick it up from the intro, I am going to be talking about the historical evaluation skill of usefulness. If you are an avid listener of History Detective, you may have noticed, that every now and then, I mention how a newspaper article may or may not be useful to my historical investigation, or the reflection questions in the show notes ask about the usefulness of a source.
So, when you are researching for history or even geography for that matter, you will come across a mountain of information on the Internet or in books or archives, wherever you are looking, and one of the most important skills you need to develop is to be a little judgemental about the sources you come across. But you can’t really do that unless you have a focus.
Usually when you are researching, you will have developed a clear inquiry question that you are trying to find the answer to. If you don’t have a clear focus, you will get lost down the vortex of rabbit holes on the Internet. So, a clear focus is first step. The next step is to find sources, both primary (from the time) and secondary (produced after the time), but like I said, once you start looking, you will probably find yourself drowning an infinite sea of resources, so you need to be a little discerning about what information you select. This is where the afore mentioned evaluation skill of usefulness comes in. Remember that the same source may be useful to answer your question about a topic, but completely useless to someone else who has a different question about the topic.
For example, in Case 4 of History Detective which was about the nuclear testing in Australia during the 1950s, I mentioned a newspaper article that described the nuclear explosion as “a ‘cabbage’ shape… before rearing upwards into the more familiar ‘mushroom’ shape.” I also remarked that it was not particularly useful for a historian exploring the effects of the nuclear testing. But what it might be useful for is someone who is studying the casual attitudes of the general public about nuclear testing, or even as an example of selective journalism or censorship during the experiments.
Another example is in Case 5 which was about Bicycle Face. A Sydney doctor had warned that because of the fear of collision with the many obstacles that the city presents women cyclists such as, trams and pedestrians, “it does not take long for her to develop bicycle face.” This is extremely useful when understanding patriarchal attitudes toward women in the 1890s. The doctor specifically refers only to “women cyclists”. The comment implies that women are physically incapable of mastering skills such as balance and spatial awareness, with reflexes so slow that they could not even navigate around a pedestrian without causing strain on their delicate constitution. The gendered vocabulary has an implication of female physical ineptitude so it made it a very useful source for my investigation.
According to my favourite dictionary, “Collin”, a judgement is an opinion that you have after carefully thinking about something. Therefore, you can’t just make a judgement about the usefulness of a source without backing yourself up with a well thought through evaluation. You need to be able to justify why a source is useful to your inquiry.
Yes, I know it is technically Collins Dictionary, but we hang out often enough to be on a nickname basis. I hope that today’s bonus episode lived up to be its promise of being more useful than a chocolate teapot. (Rabbit Hole Music 2🎼)
I would love to hear any suggestions for future episodes, so please get in contact. You can follow me on Twitter @HistoryDetect, Instagram @HistoryDetective9 or if you have any burning questions that you would like me to answer in a future bonus episode email me at historydetective9@gmail.com
This Kelly Chase, on the Case.
If you are a teacher or student, you will find a link to the transcript in the show notes.
History Detective is a completely independent podcast, so if you would like to support me so I can continue to make episodes, I have ready-made classroom resource packs available to purchase for all of the season one episodes. You can find them on my Amped Up Learning store, which is linked in the show notes.
Next time on History Detective (Transition music🎼)
Next time on History Detective, I have another bonus episode for you. Today looked at the historical skill of usefulness, but one of the most important evaluation skills that anyone can have in our fake news, opinion saturated world is assessing the reliability of sources.
If you liked what you heard and know someone who might enjoy History Detective too, please share and subscribe and because I am a teacher, you know I love gold stars feel free to rate, review. See you next time.